[FoCHAT] CHAT News: Elevation; Audit Regulations
mehrlich8 at yahoo.com
mehrlich8 at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 28 16:45:33 CDT 2009
Dear FoCHAT Members,
News
Items
1. Elevation Issues: HMGP house elevation re-imbursement funding
for RH applicants (maybe increasing, so be sure to apply and check your
eligibility); extension of ICC deadline
2. Some insightful information about Road Home Rules in ICF
audit procedure
3. Drywall problems
4. Next CHAT meeting
Elevation Grants
There are two
type of elevation grants for eligible Road Home applicants:
·
RH
elevation incentive, $30,000 but total RH grant plus RH elevation incentive
cannot be more than $150,000. No receipts are necessary.
·
The
other kind is HMGP elevation funding up to $30,000 but it may be increased very
much according to several reports. This
one is not capped by the amount of the RH grant but you do have to show
receipts, building plans, building permits, and you have to have costs that
were not covered by ICC or RH elevation. This is a reimbursement program (half
when you are halfway through and the rest when you finish (for elevating a
pre-storm house) or when you get a certificate of occupancy (for building a new
house and elevating it). The new house can’t be more than 10% larger in square
footage of the occupied area than the pre-storm house. See chatushome.com for
more important details. If you are building a new house and elevating it, then
it is the total house expense minus insurance benefits and RH money that is
used for calculation. They will even reimburse for an elevator if you have
a doctor's note.
We think
it is not too late to ask for a form for HMGP or to follow up with the state if
you did send it your form.
hazardmitigation at la.gov
and cc yourself. You could just copy this.
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please tell me if my HMGP grant eligibility has been determined.
Postal address:
Phone number:
Email address:
RH Grant ID:
06HH________
Thank you
very much,
FEMA extends deadline for home elevation reimbursement (through ICC which you get by contacting your home insurance
provider if you had flood insurance in 2005)
by David Hammer, The Times-Picayune
http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2009/03/fema_extends_deadline_for_home.html
FEMA has agreed to extend to 2012 a
looming deadline for homeowners who want to collect flood insurance money set
aside for elevating and storm-proofing their houses.
Because of the slow flow of other
federal money, such as Road Home grants, FEMA had already pushed back the
deadline for home-raising work under the National Flood Insurance Program's
Increased Cost of Compliance provision.
RH Audit Procedures
I have still pending items for public records requests from
the LRA but one item that I received may be of interest to you. I will post the
whole PDF at our website when I get a chance. For now, here is an extract of
the parts that might be of most use to some of you. I think that this is the
review (audit) that ICF is doing on all files to examine if all the needed
documents are present with no glaring contradictions. Some of you are being
asked to resend documents that you sent before. This is probably because ICF
during the review found that documents were missing (lost).
Next, the Louisiana Legislative Auditor is reviewing a small
percentage of these files for accuracy (although several critical measures of
accuracy are not part of their review). Some of you have been told that you
will get more money after closing without be in appeals and without any
description of why. This is probably because of Legislative Auditor found RH
shortchanging mistakes.
Please do not send us questions about this document because
we do not have the time or resources to respond (and, in many cases, we won’t
have the answers).
Grant Review
Checklist
Version 4.0 7.16.08
Section 1:
Applicant/Reviewer Info
Reviewers Name:
Grant Review Start Date:
Applicant Information
App ID
06HH
Option Selected
Applicant Name: Co-Applicant Name
Street Address for Damaged Property Parish
City State Zip
Structure Type: Single Family Duplex Townhouse Mobile
Home Condo
Land Ownership: Owns land Leased land
Section 2: Screening
Purpose: To determine if Grant Review should continue or
if file should be placed on hold until all issues in
this section have been resolved
Section 2.A JIRA Issues
Yes No N/A
1. Are issues in
all of the following JIRA projects in Closed or Resolved
status?
a. Appeals
b. ACT
(Appraisals, Closings and Title)
c. Grant Recovery
d. Home Evaluation
e. Ineligibles
f. Mobile Homes
g. Post Closing (exclude ACG Component)
h. Pre Closing
i. Resolutions
j. Special
Projects
k. Strike Team
If all YES and/or N/A continue to question 2
If any NO place the file on HOLD and stop the review
until all issues are
closed or
resolved.
Grant
Review Checklist
Version 4.0 7.16.08
3. If ownership is for both units, is the PSV
in the supporting document
based on both units?
If all YES continue to Section 5.C PSV Type.
If any NO open an ACT issue and place the
file on HOLD. Continue to
Section 6. Estimated Cost of Damage
Section 5.C PSV Type
Check the value type that was used for the
calculation in “Current Values”
and complete the checklist for the checked
value type. Only one selection
can be made.
1. 1004 Appraisal – Program Ordered
2.
Field Review – Program Ordered
3.
Applicant provided pre-storm appraisal by a licensed appraiser
4.
Applicant provided post storm appraisal of pre-storm value.
5. Lender analysis (Data feed only, no
documentation)
6. Market analysis
7. Brokers Price Opinion (BPO)
8. Automated Valuation Method (AVM – Data
feed only, no
documentation)
9. NADA Only
10. NADA plus Land Value
Yes No N/A
1. 1004 Appraisal –
Program Ordered
1. Is the 1004 Appraisal uploaded and
viewable in eGP?
If YES continue to question 2.
If NO create an ACT issue and place the file
on HOLD Continue to Section 6
Estimated Cost of Damage
2. Answer all of the following questions:
a. Does the structure type listed in the
document match the
structure type in eGP?
b. Does the address of the subject property
in the document
match the damaged address in eGP?
c. Does the PSV of the subject property in
the document match
the Closed PSV in eGP?
d. Is there documentation uploaded in eGP
showing the
appraiser carries a LA license (www.lreasbc.state.la.us)?
If all YES continue to Section 6. Estimated
Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
If any NO create an ACT issue and place the
file on HOLD. Continue to
Section 6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
2. Field Review
1. Is the Field Review document uploaded and
viewable in eGP?
If YES, continue to question 2.
If NO, create an ACT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section
6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
2. Answer all of the following questions:
a. Does the structure type listed in the
document match the
structure type in eGP?
b. Does the address of the subject property
in the document
match the damaged address in eGP?
c. Does the PSV of the subject property in
the document match
the Closed PSV in eGP?
d. Is there documentation uploaded in eGP
showing the
appraiser carries a LA license (www.lreasbc.state.la.us)?
If all YES continue to Section 6 Estimated
Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
If any NO create an ACT issue and place the
file on HOLD. Continue to
Section 6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
3. Applicant-provided pre-storm Appraisal
Note: The Value on the Pre
Storm Appraisal may not match the value in eGP due to
the application of a price
index appreciation
Note: If the applicant
provided pre storm appraisal is on a mobile home, create an
ACT issue for review of
the appraisal. Place the file on hold until the issue is
resolved. Continue to
Section 6: Estimated Cost of Damage.
1. Is the applicant-provided pre-storm
Appraisal document uploaded
and viewable in eGP?
If YES continue to question 2.
If NO create an ACT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section
6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
2. Answer all of the following questions:
a. Does the structure type listed in the
document
match the structure type in eGP?
b. Does the address of the subject property
in the
document match the damaged address in eGP?
c. Does the PSV of the subject property in
the
document match the PSV entered in the
pre-storm history
box on the calculation page OR the
application data report in
eGP?
d. Is the appraisal dated between January 1,
2000 and August 28, 2005 for Katrina or September
23, 2005
for Rita?
e. Does the appraisal completed date entered
in eGP match the
date on the document?
f. Is there documentation uploaded in eGP
showing the
appraiser carries a LA license (www.lreasbc.state.la.us)?
g. Is the appraisal document signed by the
appraiser?
If all YES continue to Section 6 Estimated
Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
If any NO create an ACT issue and place the
file on HOLD. Continue to
Section 6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
4. Applicant-provided post storm appraisal of pre-storm
value
Note: If the applicant provided post storm
appraisal of pre storm value is on
a mobile home create an ACT issue for review
of the appraisal. Place the
file on hold until the issue is resolved.
Continue to Section 6 Estimated Cost
of Damage.
1. Is the Applicant-provided post-storm
appraisal of pre-storm value
document uploaded and viewable in eGP?
If YES continue to question 2
If NO create an ACT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section 6
Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD) Determination
2. Answer all of the following questions:
a. Does the structure type listed in the
document match the
structure type in eGP?
b. Does the address of subject property in
the document match
the damaged address in eGP?
c. Does the value of the subject property in
the document match
the value in eGP
d. Is the value on the document within 120%
of the highest valid
program value that was available at the time
the file was sent
to closing?
e. Does the appraisal clearly indicate that
the appraisal is
intended to reflect value at the time of or
just prior to the
storm?
f. Is the appraisal dated after August 29,
2005 for Katrina or
September 24, 2005 for Rita?
g. Is there documentation uploaded in eGP
showing the
appraiser carries a LA license (www.lreasbc.state.la.us)?
h. Is the appraisal document signed by the
appraiser?
If all YES continue to Section 6 Estimated
Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
If any NO create an ACT issue and place the
file on HOLD. Continue to
Section 6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
5. Lender analysis
No documentation to review. Continue to
Section 6 Estimated Cost of
Damage (ECD) Determination.
6. Market Analysis
Note: If the structure
type is a mobile home located on leased land and the Market
Analysis is used as the
PSV, create an ACT issue for a review of the Market
Analysis. Place the file
on hold until the issue is resolved. Continue to Section 6:
Estimated Cost of Damage.
1. Is the market analysis document uploaded
and viewable in eGP?
If YES continue to question 2
If NO create an ACT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section
6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
2. Answer all of the following questions:
a. Does the structure type listed in the
document match the
structure type in eGP?
b. Does the address of subject property in
the document match
the damaged address in eGP?
c. Does the value of the subject property in
the document match
the value in eGP?
d. If the damaged structure is a mobile home
is the following
condition met(select one):
___ If the damaged structure is a mobile home
built prior to
1977 are all comparables identified as mobile
homes of
similar size and also built before 1977?
___ If the damaged structure is a mobile home
built in or after
1977 are all comparables identified as mobile
homes of
similar size and also built in or after 1977?
If all YES or N/A continue to Section 6
Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
If any NO create an ACT issue and place the
file on HOLD. Continue to
Section 6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
7. Brokers Price Opinion
(BPO)
1. Is the BPO document uploaded and viewable
in eGP?
If YES continue to question 2.
If NO create an ACT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section
6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD) Determination
2. Answer all of the following questions:
a. Does the structure type listed in the
document match the
structure type in eGP?
b. Does the address of subject property in
the document match
the damaged address in eGP?
c. Does the Final Opinion of Value on the
document match the
value in eGP? Note: If the land ownership is
for leased land
use the Final Opinion of Value LESS the Land
Value to
confirm the PSV used in the calculation.
d. If the damaged structure is a mobile home
is the following
condition met(select one):
___ If the damaged structure is a mobile home
built prior to
1977 are all comparables identified as mobile
homes of
similar size and also built before1977?
___ If the damaged structure is a mobile home
built in or after
1977 are all comparables identified as mobile
homes of
similar size and also built in or after 1977?
If all YES or N/A continue to Section 6
Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
If any NO create an ACT issue and place the
file on HOLD. Continue to
Section 6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
8. Automated Valuation
Method
No documentation to review. Continue to
Section 6 Estimated Cost of
Damage (ECD) Determination.
9. NADA Value (National
Automobile Dealers Association)
Note: Complete this
section only if the structure is a mobile home on leased land.
1. Is the NADA document uploaded and viewable
in eGP?
If YES continue to question 2.
If NO create an ACT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section
6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
2. Answer all of the following questions:
a. Does the eGP ID on the NADA form match the
eGP ID of this
file?
b. Do supporting documents in the file
confirm the Year
Manufactured and the Manufacturer on the NADA
form?
c. Does the Total Adjusted (Retail) Value of
Home and Optional
Equipment on the NADA form match the PSV in
eGP?
If all YES continue to Section 6 Estimated
Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
If any NO create an ACT issue and place the
file on HOLD. Continue to
Section 6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD) Determination
10. NADA Value (National
Automobile Dealers Association) PLUS Land
Value
Note: Complete this
section only if the structure is a mobile home on Owned Land
1. Is the NADA document uploaded and viewable
in eGP?
If YES continue to question 2.
If NO create an ACT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section
6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
2. Answer all of the following questions:
a. Does the eGP ID on the NADA form match the
eGP ID of this
file?
b. Do supporting documents in the file
confirm the Year
Manufactured and the Manufacturer on the NADA
form?
c. Is there a BPO, Land Appraisal or other
document that
supports the land value?
d. Does the Total Adjusted (Retail) Value of
Home and Optional
Equipment on the NADA form PLUS the land
value match the
PSV in eGP?
If all YES continue to Section 6 Estimated
Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
If any NO create an ACT issue and place the
file on HOLD. Continue to
Section 6 Estimated Cost of Damage (ECD)
Determination
Section 6: Estimated Cost of Damage
(ECD) Determination
Purpose: To determine
whether the damaged address, structure type, and ECD value in eGP match the
corresponding
information in the
Compensation Allowance Document (CAD)
Yes No N/A
Compensation
Allowance Document (CAD)
1. Answer all of the following questions:
a) Is the CAD Cover Sheet and CAD uploaded
and viewable in
eGP?
b) Does the address on the CAD Cover Sheet
/CAD match the
damaged address in eGP?
c) Does the structure type on the CAD Cover
Sheet / CAD match
the structure type in eGP?
d) Does the current ECD value on the Grant
Approval Screen in
eGP match the ECD value on the CAD Cover
Sheet?
e) Does the Type shown in eGP match the Type
on the CAD
Cover Sheet?
If all YES continue to Section 7 ACG/Income
Documentation
Grant
Review Checklist
Version 4.0 7.16.08
If any NO create a Home Evaluation Issue and
place the file on hold.
Continue to Section 7 ACG/Income
Documentation
Section 7: ACG / Income Documentation
Purpose:
To determine for all applicants who received an ACG whether the completed
Eligibility Checklist
indicates
they were eligible to receive ACG.
Complete
this section only if the applicant received an ACG; otherwise skip to next
section
Yes No N/A
1. Did the applicant receive an ACG?
If YES continue to question 2
If NO continue to Section 8. Duplication of
Benefits
2. Is the completed ACG Eligibility Checklist
uploaded and
viewable in eGP?
If YES continue to question 3
If NO and there is not an active ACG issue in
JIRA create one. If an active
ACG JIRA issue exists do not create one.
Place the file on hold and
continue to Section 8 Duplication of Benefits
3. Does the ACG Eligibility Checklist
indicate that the owner occupant is
eligible to receive an ACG (Eligible or
Eligible with Corrective
Action)?
If YES continue to Section 8 Duplication of
Benefits.
If NO continue to question 4
4. Does the ACG Eligibility Checklist
indicate that the owner occupant is
Ineligible to receive an ACG?
If YES confirm the ACG is not included in the
current values in eGP (if not
turn income calc off in application) and
continue to Section 8 Duplication of
Benefits
If NO continue to question 5
5. Does the ACG Eligibility Checklist
indicate a
disposition of Not Determinable?
If YES place the file on hold. Do not create
an ACG issue as one already
exists. Note the hold reason in Grant Review
JIRA. Continue to Section 8
Duplication of Benefits.
If NO refer the file to a Team Leader for
issue resolution before continuing
with Section 8 Duplication of Benefits
Section
8: Duplication of Benefits
Purpose:
To determine whether there are variances between closed values (first
disbursements) or previous
closing
values (additional disbursements) and current values on Homeowners Insurance,
Flood Insurance and
FEMA
Assistance. Values will
not be reconfirmed post closing except when Applicant provided insurance
values are greater than 10% of the
insurer provided value.
Section 8.A Homeowner’s
Insurance Values
Homeowners Insurance
Documentation Review: Review eGP for any
uploaded documents titled Insurance or other
supporting insurance
documents. Look in the Application, Post
Closing, and OCD folders. If a
review of the documentation identifies a
concern regarding the applicants /
co-applicants occupancy at the time of the
storm (service address / mailing
address to damaged address) or identifies a
different structure type than
what is showing in eGP create an ACT issue
and place the file on HOLD.
Continue to Section 8.B Flood Insurance.
1. Check the current verification source for
Homeowners Insurance that is displayed in the
Other Compensation section on the Grant
Approval Screen?
____ V = Data Warehouse Verified
____ A = Applicant Verified
____ O = Override
____N = No Insurance
2. Check the file for insurance documents
related to insurance settlement/claim amounts and
select one of the following options below. If
the insurance document uploaded does not reflect
settlement or payout amounts follow the No
Documentation Option.
a) _____ No Documentation: Homeowner’s
Insurance Settlement / Claim documentation is NOT
uploaded into eGP. Complete Section 8.A.1 for
the verification source selected above.
b) _____ Documentation Available: Homeowner’s
Insurance Settlement / Claim documentation is
uploaded into eGP. Complete Section 8.A.2 for
the verification source selected above.
Section 8.A.1 Home Owners
Insurance values with NO Documentation
Yes No
N/A
If = V
Continue to Section 8.B Flood Insurance
If = A
1. Confirm Insurance Company Name, Policy
Number and Settled
Amount from the Applicant page in eGP are
valid and settled amount
matches current value on Calculation page in
eGP.
If YES continue to Section 8.B Flood
Insurance
If NO create an IVT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section 8.B
Flood Insurance
If = N
1. Was the insurance penalty applied?
If YES continue to Section to Section 8.B
Flood Insurance
If NO create an IVT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section 8.B
Flood Insurance
If = O
Create an IVT issue and place the file on
HOLD. Continue to Section
8.B Flood Insurance.
Hint: Insurance
documentation and an override form must be uploaded
in eGP to support the O
value. Once documentation is available
complete Section 8.A.2 for
files with documentation.
Section 8.A.2 Homeowner’s
Insurance values WITH Applicant
Documentation
Yes No N/A
If = V
Confirm the 10% Rule was followed: The 10% Rule states
the applicant
provided insurance value (per file documentation)
must be less than
110% of the current value
(Multiply V value by 1.1 to establish V
tolerance value)
1. Is the applicant provided insurance value
supported by file
documentation less than V tolerance value
established above?
If YES continue to Section 8.B Flood
Insurance
If NO create an IVT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to section 8.B
Flood Insurance
If = A
1. Does the insurance amount paid to the
homeowner based on the file
documentation match to the current A value in
eGP?
If YES continue to section 8.B Flood
Insurance
If NO create an IVT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section 8.B
Flood Insurance
If = N
If insurance documents are in the file and
clearly support the applicant /coapplicant
had insurance coverage create an IVT issue
and place the file on
HOLD. Continue to Section 8.B Flood
Insurance.
If = O
1. Does the file contain an approved IVT
Certification or Override form
along with applicant documentation?
If YES continue to question 2
If NO create an IVT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section 8.B
Flood Insurance
2. Does the override value on the form match
the eGP current value?
If YES continue to section 8.B Flood
Insurance
If NO create an IVT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section 8.B
Flood Insurance
Section 8.B Flood
Insurance Values
Flood Insurance
Documentation Review: Review eGP for any uploaded
documents titled Insurance or other
supporting insurance documents. Look in
the Application, Post Closing, and OCD
folders. If a review of the
documentation identifies a concern regarding
the applicants / co-applicants
occupancy at the time of the storm (service
address / mailing address to
damaged address) or identifies a different
structure type than what is showing
in eGP create an ACT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section
8.B Flood Insurance.
1) Check the current verification source for
Flood Insurance that is displayed
in the Other Compensation section on the
Grant Approval Screen?
____ V = Data Warehouse Verified
____ A = Applicant Verified
____ O = Override
____N = No Insurance
2) Check the file for insurance documents
related to insurance
settlement/claim amounts. Select one of the
following options below. If the
insurance document uploaded does not reflect
settlement or payout amounts
follow the No Documentation Option.
a) _____ No Documentation: Flood Insurance
Settlement / Claim
documentation is NOT uploaded into eGP.
Complete Section 8.B.1 for
the verification source selected above.
b) _____ Documentation Available: Flood
Insurance Settlement /
Claim documentation is uploaded into eGP.
Complete Section 8.B.2
for the verification source selected above.
Section 8.B.1 Flood
Insurance values with NO Documentation
Yes No
N/A
If = V
Continue to Section 8.C FEMA Assistance
If = A
1. Confirm Insurance Company Name, Policy
Number and Settled
Amount from the Applicant page in eGP are
valid and settled amount
matches current value on Calculation page in
eGP.
If YES continue to Section 8.C FEMA
Assistance
If NO create an IVT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section 8.C
FEMA Assistance
If = N
1. If the property was located in the 100
Year Flood Plain was the
insurance penalty applied? (Select N/A if the
property is not located in
the 100 year flood plain)
If YES continue to Section to Section 8.C
FEMA Assistance
If NO create an IVT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section 8.C
FEMA Assistance.
If N/A (not located in 100 yr flood plain)
continue to Section 8.C FEMA
Assistance.
If = O
Create an IVT issue and place the file on
HOLD. Continue to Section
8.C FEMA Assistance
Hint: Insurance
documentation and an override form must be uploaded in eGP
to support O value. Once
documentation is available complete Section 8.A.2
for files with
documentation.
Section 8.B.2 Flood
Insurance values WITH Applicant Documentation
Yes No
N/A
If = V
Confirm the 10% Rule was
followed: The 10% Rule states the applicant
provided insurance value
(per file documentation) must be less than
110% of the current value
(Multiply V value by 1.1 to establish V
tolerance value)
1. Is the applicant provided insurance value
supported by file
documentation less than V tolerance value
established above?
If YES continue to Section 8.C FEMA
Assistance
If NO create an IVT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to section 8.C
FEMA Assistance
If = A
1. Does the insurance amount paid to the
homeowner based on the file
documentation match to the current A value in
eGP?
If YES continue to section 8.C FEMA
Assistance
If NO create an IVT issue and place the file
on HOLD. Continue to Section 8.C
FEMA Assistance
If
= N
Another News Item: Chinese Drywall
Controversy Arrives in Louisiana
http://blogs. wsj.com/developm
ents/2009/ 03/17/chinese- drywall-controve rsy-arrives- in-louisiana/
claiming that the wall board in
their house is emitting a “rotten egg” smell, causing respiratory problems and
corroding electrical equipment
Still Showing on Cox 10 TV
Cox 10, The 2-hour Dec. 10, 2008 CHAT
meeting about Road Home Contradictions(including a 35-min commentary by a
former ICF and Quadel employee,
who has extensive background in government grant programs)
was/will be shown on: Tues., Dec. 16, 4 PM; Wed., Dec. 17, noon; Thurs., Dec. 18, 8 AM;
Tues., Dec. 23, noon; Thurs., Dec. 25, noon; Fri., Dec. 26, 8 AM; Sat., Dec.
27, 4:30 PM; Sun., Dec. 28, 1 PM; Mon., Dec. 29, noon; Wed., Dec. 31, 2 PM;
Thurs., Jan. 1, 1 PM; Fri., Jan. 2, 8 AM & 6 PM; Sat., Jan. 3, 3 PM; Mon.,
Jan. 5, 1:30 PM; Tues., Jan. 6, 3 PM; Wed., Jan. 7, noon; Thurs, Jan. 8, 4 PM;
Fri., Jan. 9, 1:30 PM; Sat., Jan., 10, 3 PM; Mon., Jan. 12, 4 PM; Tues., Jan.
13, noon; Wed., Jan. 14, 2 PM; Thurs., Jan. 15, 2 PM; Fri., Jan. 16, noon;
Sat., Jan. 17, 3 PM; Mon., Jan. 26, 4 PM; Tues., Jan. 27, noon; Wed., Jan. 28,
4:30 PM; Thurs., Jan. 29, noon; Fri., Jan. 30, 3 PM; Sat., Jan. 31, 4 PM; Mon.,
Feb. 2, noon; Tues., Feb. 3, 4 PM; Wed., Feb. 4, 4:30 PM; Fri., Feb. 6, noon;
Sat., Feb. 7, 9 AM; Mon., Feb. 16, 12:30 PM; Wed., Feb. 18, noon; Thurs., Feb.
19, 1:30 PM; Fri., Feb. 20, 2 PM; Sat., Feb. 21, 3 PM; Wed., Feb. 25, 1:30 PM;
Thurs., Feb. 26, 2:30 PM; Friday, Feb. 27, 3:30 PM; Tues., Mar. 3, 12:30 PM;
Thurs., Mar. 5, noon; Sat., Mar. 7, 10 AM; Mon., Mar. 9, noon; Wed., Mar. 11,
1:30 PM; Fri., Mar. 13, 8 AM; Sat., Mar. 14, 10 AM; Mon., Mar. 16, noon; Wed.,
Mar. 18, 1:30 PM; Mon., Mar. 23, noon; Wed., Apr. 1, 2 PM; Fri., Apr. 3, noon.
Next CHAT Meeting
Time: Meetings on Wed. at 6:30 PM at UNO, usually every
other week
Place: Room 179, UNO Milneburg Hall, on Milneburg
Rd. (the road where the brand new dorms are, past the stop sign and the University
Center and opposite the Fitness Center.
Building #24: Directions to the Business Bldg are given on the Campus
Map for UNO
NEXT MEETING Wed.,
Apr. 22. Newcomers are welcome.*
Best wishes,
Melanie Ehrlich
Co-Chairman, Citizens’ Road Home Action Team (CHAT)
Member, LRA Housing Task Force
http://chatushome.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://chatushome.com/pipermail/fochat/attachments/20090328/a2fb14e1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the FoCHAT
mailing list